This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Verification of abuse contact addresses ?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Verification of abuse contact addresses ?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Verification of abuse contact addresses ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Fri Mar 8 22:01:12 CET 2019
In message <20190308030704.af7f9f79718891d8e76b551cf73e1563.3317785c9a.wbe at email19.godaddy.com>, "Fi Shing" <phishing at storey.xxx> wrote: > If it takes more than a week to verify your entire database, there is > the first sign that something is wrong with your system. For whatever little it is worth, I would just like to say that I am in general agreement with the proposition that it should be possible, in the very short run, to reliably determine which, among a set a email addresses, perhaps even numbering up to a million, are or are not producing undeliverable bounce responses. That having been said, I should also note that making this determination with high accuracy is not nearly as easy as some folks might imagine, due mostly to the utter lack of standards when it comes to the format of undeliverable bounce responses. And thus, some amount of manual "eyeballing" may be involved with any attempt to do this at scale. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Verification of abuse contact addresses ?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Verification of abuse contact addresses ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]