This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Interesting email abuse header extract
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Fi Shing
phishing at storey.xxx
Sat Jun 1 06:44:10 CEST 2019
It is not for RIPE to abandon a policy proposal simply because a resource holder is too cheap to implement it. --------- Original Message --------- Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox") From: "Neil McRae" <neil.mcrae at bt.com> Date: 5/31/19 12:05 am To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net I'm subscribing to the list specifically to also position not in favour of this policy. This will generate work for the NCC that just wastes their time following up on lots of false positives. It will have _zero_ impact on the handling of abuse requests, in-fact I predict that perhaps even make response time worse. I urge the community to reject this proposal. Neil. -- Neil J. McRae neil.mcrae at BT.COM Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20190531/1aea5890/attachment.html>
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Interesting email abuse header extract
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]