This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Tue Feb 19 13:23:12 CET 2019
I guess the subject is wrong :-) On Tue, 19 Feb 2019, Thomas Hungenberg wrote: > FYI: Some longer-term statistics on this: > > Since January 2018, we have identified 157 invalid abuse contacts > (our abuse reports bounced) for network objects registered with > country code "DE" which we reported to RIPE NCC. > RIPE NCC reached out to their members responsible for the > respective objects. We sent out 2318 abuse reports this year (since 1st Jan 2019), and only 63 bounced. Not sure how many of these 63 are RIPE-related, but will have to investigate :-) > 150 cases have been solved by updating the abuse contact or correcting > the mail server configuration - usually within only a few days. > > There are only 2 cases older than four weeks still unresolved. That's excellent. Regarding the non-"DE" the figures are worse, right? Best Regards, Carlos > Thanks again to RIPE NCC for their great assistance! > > > - Thomas >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]