This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Email Spam & Spam Abuse Definitions
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Email Spam & Spam Abuse Definitions
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] *** Re: Email Spam & Spam Abuse Definitions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Fi Shing
phishing at storey.xxx
Sun Apr 28 05:54:40 CEST 2019
The twitter example is not advertising a product or service. It is conveying information about a product/service that the person has already hired. If twitter sends unsolicited emails to someone when they have not requested that service, or have indicated they no longer want the service, then it is spam. --------- Original Message --------- Subject: [anti-abuse-wg] Email Spam & Spam Abuse Definitions From: "ac" <ac at main.me> Date: 4/27/19 4:22 am To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net Hi, From a recent rant in the WG, something of interest was posted; > opinions on the proper definition of spam. Mr. Andre's preferred > definition appears to allow for "one time" invitations to be blasted > to everyone in the universe. Nonetheless, in Mr. Andre's considered > opinion, "Email Spam is not the same as Spam Abuse" and a "... one In my opinion, the sending of a confirmation email, from say Twitter, to confirm that the actual email address does indeed exist and that their further communications will be solicited - as well as including links to remove/stop further communications: Would be spam (it is still an unsolicited email) - but that single confirmation email is not abuse in itself. Even though Twitter may send 1000's of these to 1000's of different email addresses... I do not think that there is anyone, that works with actual spam abuse, in this WG that disagrees completely with my opinion above. Also, I wanted to add another useful resource link for anyone that is still learning about email abuse: https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-409 What is frequently missed is that BULK EMAIL itself, is not the issue, but that the keyword is "unsolicited" - For example if you were to relay 1000 Invoices or 1000 status notifications or 1000 opted in mailing list recipients, this would/should not be considered spam or abuse. Then, of course, imnsho UBE itself is outdated as the spammers use 'drip' systems by spinning out 10000's of emails from 10000's of ip's Which various RBL cater for by speedily listing and de-listing resources and then there are all the shiny new tech things, which probably needs a new thread: Automated comment spam or AI based web form spam is a growing issue and is something that merits discussion and a watchful eye... Andre -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20190427/fbeea500/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Email Spam & Spam Abuse Definitions
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] *** Re: Email Spam & Spam Abuse Definitions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]