[anti-abuse-wg] AS24940 Hetzner -- non-role contact wanted

On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 17:41:20 -0700
"Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg at tristatelogic.com> wrote:
<snip senseless rant around here>
> 
> Mr. Chairman, I ask you to summarily eject the member in question
> from the mailing list with clear instructions not to return and not
> to try to do so via the ruse of yet additional sock puppet fradulent
> identities.  I ask you to do so in accordance with your clear
> authority and responsibility under the RIPE Code of Conduct, which
> is, I think, not at all ambiguous on this point.  You cannot, I
> think, merely stand by and allow arbitrary actors with hidden agendas
> and fradulent identities to infiltrate and repeatedly disrupt and
> thwart this Working Group, or this mailing list, whether via repeated
> off-topic rantings or via other artificial means.  To do so would be
> a serious abrogation of your responsibilities as Chair of this WG,
> and one which I and others might reasonably feel duty bound to bring
> to the attention of other and higher RIPE authorities.
> 
> I await the Chair's response and the Chair's appropriate action.
> 

So, if you do not get your way, me being ejected, then you are
threatening the Chair?

All in the same post.

You are indeed an arrogant and ignorant bully.

And, you are the disruption. You have carefully crafted an identity
over a decade or more, yet, even after looking carefully, I cannot see
that you are pushing packets in RIPE. I also cannot see you anywhere
among my own colleagues and I therefore do not understand what you are
doing in this WG, except to cause disruption, division and spread FUD.

Your behavior even in this thread:

1. You post on a website (links included in your original post) clearly
states that Hetzner cannot investigate without you agreeing that they
send the email headers to the service provider

You claim that this idea is the worst idea since "This is probably the
best European idea since the one about invading Russia in Winter."

2. When I point out that you are technically incorrect or ignorant - as
the Hetzner response is completely true, ethical and correct and YOU
are wrong

You start attacking me, with us now here where you are threatening 
that if I am not ejected from this WG you " I and others might
reasonably feel duty bound to bring to the attention of other and
higher RIPE authorities."

Your disruptive, arrogant and bully behavior is cause for you to be
ejected from this WG

Andre