This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ac
ac at main.me
Fri Apr 19 10:08:43 CEST 2019
On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 09:51:56 +0200 Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 07:33:19PM -0700, Fi Shing wrote: > > <html><body><span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#000; > > font-size:12pt;"><div><br></div><div style="">What absolute crap. > > Why is that every time something resembling common sense enters > > this group, there are these people who insist on using slippery > > slop fallacy?</div><div style=""><span mce_style="font-size: 12pt;" > > style=""><br style=""></span></div><div style=""><span > > mce_style="font-size: 12pt;" style=""><a target="_blank" <snip snip> > > HTML-mails, top posted, on a mailing list that has a different mail > style. Very impolite and unconsiderate. > +1, but anyway... > But anyway: the point that Randy is making that this policy is neither > common sense, nor effective in reducing abuse. So it's not the way > to go. > so you are taking it upon yourself to attach your own opinion by commenting on how you interpret the point(s) Randy is making? how rude and presumptuous of yourself. it seems many people (including myself) are rude, obnoxious, not tolerant as well as very impolite and "unconsiderate" Anyway, to add my own interpretation, seeing as this is what we are now reduced to, I am understanding that Randy is pointing out that when 2019-03 moves forward, this is common sense and not a "slippery slope" *sigh* - this is one of the most commented on and longest suffering thread(s) ever. It seems there are vested interests in ensuring that RIPE does not exercise any administrative (or limited) authority and only acts as a 'sort of' loose record or some sort of index of who may possibly or potentially be assigned which public resources... I just wish to add the one thing that I have not yet seen in the thread(s): I would propose that should RIR not act with administrative authority we can expect world governments to legislate as chaos is not in the best interests of civil society. Andre
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]