This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Mysteries of the Internet: AS65000
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Mysteries of the Internet: AS65000
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Mysteries of the Internet: AS65000
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ac
ac at main.me
Mon Apr 15 06:32:01 CEST 2019
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 09:40:35 +0530 Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > On 15/04/19, 9:26 AM, "anti-abuse-wg on behalf of ac" > <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net on behalf of ac at main.me> wrote: > > Sorry for top posting, but I fail to see how any of this is > > abuse related? > > Given that it is RFG raising this, I think it is a pretty safe bet > that this ASN is associated with some abusive activity that he has > seen. > Okay, but this is not yet clear? pvt asn is leaked often (and sometimes voluminous) - so is common/frequent and in itself means nothing, if this is that, - but as this affects that network, there is no abuse? or I am missing something?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Mysteries of the Internet: AS65000
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Mysteries of the Internet: AS65000
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]