This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Speaking of routing funny business... what's up with AS65021?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Speaking of routing funny business... what's up with AS65021?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] telia.lt: Ignoring abuse complaints (?)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Sat Apr 6 22:10:59 CEST 2019
In message <alpine.LRH.2.21.1904060910530.21127 at gauntlet.corp.fccn.pt>, =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Carlos_Fria=E7as?= <cfriacas at fccn.pt> wrote: >> I would say that this is just a very temporary mishap, and a temporary >> "fat fingered" anomaly if it were not for the fact that some of these >> routes have, according to RIPE Rotuing History, been countinuously >> announced for over four full months now. > >That's a bit long so that noone notices it... (and fixes it). Yes. >Thus, some filters >are not in place or they have a serious hole... :-( Can I request someone within the RIPE region to contact these people and try to see if they will respnd about this issue in a meaningful fashion? I already tried myself, but I just got back a response saying, in effect, "Yea. So? Why are you bothering us?" I guess that I have not been able to explain the problem to them very well. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Speaking of routing funny business... what's up with AS65021?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] telia.lt: Ignoring abuse complaints (?)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]