This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 89, Issue 15
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 89, Issue 15
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 89, Issue 15 -- was about 2019-03
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Fri Apr 5 20:59:57 CEST 2019
In message <28F8CA64-F298-4A5B-99D0-411F96C56004 at gmail.com>, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com> wrote: >Come to think of it, Philip and Geoff have been presenting their CIDR report >on aggregation for even longer than that. I haven't seen their list of >prefixes that could do with a ton of aggregation getting any smaller .. Yea. And according to what I see from time to time on bgp.he.net, plenty of entities are still announcing bogons. And according to what I see from time to time on RIPE Routing History, quite a few people are or have been announcing ridiculous routes, like for /2. All in all, not a pretty picture. In fact it all gives the impression of a pretty absurd level of anarchy. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 89, Issue 15
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 89, Issue 15 -- was about 2019-03
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]