This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] New on RIPE Labs: How We Will Be Validating abuse-c
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New on RIPE Labs: How We Will Be Validating abuse-c
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Agenda Update AA-WG RIPE 77
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Koch
pk at DENIC.DE
Fri Oct 12 10:02:49 CEST 2018
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 01:21:44PM +0200, Mirjam Kuehne wrote: > https://labs.ripe.net/Members/angela_dallara/how-we-will-be-validating-abuse-c thanks for designing and sharing this sensible approach. Please allow a few questions (maybe for the WG presentation): o "We will start with a verification tool which checks that there are no formatting errors in the email address, verifies DNS entries, looks for bogus or honeypot emails ... Could you elaborate a bit on the latter two? o "An initial test with the validation tool suggests that around 20-25% of resource holders may need to validate or update their abuse contacts." Understanding that the sentence says "initial test", but mentions "resource holders", is this 20-25% of the 70.000 addresses? Thanks, Peter
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New on RIPE Labs: How We Will Be Validating abuse-c
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Agenda Update AA-WG RIPE 77
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]