[anti-abuse-wg] GDPR - positive effects on email abuse

Hi,

One can argue that a "real abuse contact" related to a DNS domain is 
necessary for the contract's performance, no?

The same is valid about the contract between RIPE/NCC and LIRs over 
assigned IP address space, right?

Cheers,
Carlos


On Tue, 29 May 2018, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote:

> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 02:50:09PM +0200, Simon Forster wrote:
>> Would you be able to point to the section of the GDPR which states this? 
>> Admission: I have yet to make it to the end of the 88 pages of the act 
>> without falling asleep.
>
> It derives (also the tenor of NOYB's filing, aiui) from Article
> 7(4):
>
> "4. When assessing whether consent is freely given, utmost
> account shall be taken of whether, inter alia, the performance of
> a contract, including the provision of a service, is conditional
> on consent to the processing of personal data that is not
> necessary for the performance of that contract."
>
> http://www.privacy-regulation.eu/en/article-7-conditions-for-consent-GDPR.htm
>
> cheers,
> Sascha Luck
>
>> 
>>> The first case regarding this has already been filed:
>>> https://www.irishtimes.com/business/technology/max-schrems-files-first-cases-under-gdpr-against-facebook-and-google-1.3508177 
>>> <https://www.irishtimes.com/business/technology/max-schrems-files-first-cases-under-gdpr-against-facebook-and-google-1.3508177>
>> I appreciate a motion has been filed. However, I???d surprised if the case 
>> purely revolved around this single point.
>> 
>> It is positive that some of this stuff is going to be tested in court 
>> sooner rather than later. Having said that, it may be <sarcasm> a day or 
>> two </sarcasm> before we get to see a final judgement with no further 
>> appeals.
>> 
>> All the best
>> 
>> Simon
>