This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Karl-Josef Ziegler
kjz at gmx.net
Sun Mar 18 13:29:14 CET 2018
Andre Ox wrote: > But having some sort of policy is a start, even though > what we are actually ending up with is not much at all and even then > there are those that think even having a watery (watered down, > toothless, etc) policy is a future threat. Yes, I agree. Making only a small step - even if it may be only symbolic - is still better than making no steps at all. Best regards, Karl-Josef
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]