[anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02

Hi,

On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 10:53:55AM +0200, ox wrote:
> To answer the question though: This proposal does make the world a
> better place.
> 
> If a resource holder wishes to be allocated scarce public resources
> such a resource holder should also be responsible about the operations
> of such scarce public resources.

In which way, exactly, would this proposal have an effect to achieve 
this goal (a goal that I share, to state it explicitly)?

I maintain the position that those that do care can be reached today, and
those that do not care will find ways to fulfill the letter of the policy,
and not change their ways.

So, to repeat Malcolm's position: if we introduce new work for the NCC 
and the LIRs, does it improve things enough to be the right thing to do?


(As a side note, we recently were contacted by the NCC because one of
our 'sponsoring LIR' customers had changed their primary domain and 
forgot to update their contact details in the RIPE DB, thus, making them
unreachable.  Someone noticed, complained to the NCC, the NCC contacted 
the sponsoring LIR, and contact details were corrected.  Things seem to
work today where people care...)

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20180317/bad9bae8/attachment.sig>