This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Sat Mar 17 08:43:45 CET 2018
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:33:47PM -0700, Name wrote:
> <html><body><span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#000; font-size:12pt;"><div>So he has no basis of objection, but don't even think of implementing something that might actually go towards helping the internet in the future, because it's a slippery slope and Adolf Hitler 2.0 will reign supreme, even though this proposal (as it turned out) does absolutely nothing to verify abuse mailbox attributes, but the mere fact this has come up as discussion is incredibly dangerous, because it shows there might be someone within any of the LIR who is acknowledging that maybe they are responsible for the internet being a shit hole, and that simply cannot happen, because then resource owners might actually have to do some work. What a horrible thought.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div>
Reading comments like *this* as an argument *for* the proposal makes me
wonder if I should reconsider being neutral about it.
What Malcolm said is something that carefully needs to be considered: what
is the real goal to be achieved, and does this proposal help in any way
to get there? If *not*, extra measures that use up resources and could
have unforeseen consequences, should not be implemented.
What Sasha said is also something that carefully needs to be considered,
and not just waved away as "he's just being irresponsible".
To ask you: in which ways will this proposal help the internet make
less of a "shit hole"? Those that care already have working abuse
contacts, those that care not will find ways to fulfill the letter of
the policy, and still care not.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20180317/ebd72ff4/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]