[anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02

Hi,

> Op 14 mrt. 2018, om 15:22 heeft Name <phishing at storey.xxx> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> This does not address black hole email addresses, nor does it validate that an email address is an abuse email address. I could put YOUR email address as my abuse contact. Because your email address is valid, it would pass your check?
> 
> And then an individual would have to prove that an email address is not working at all, to complain to RIPE? But your email address does work?
> 
> How is it that you have spent how ever many months on this garbage, and come out with exactly the same position you were in before hand?

This proposal is a first step to catch low hanging fruit. Yes: there are many things that can (should) be improved, but getting consensus on these controversial topics is difficult. So the proposers are taking it one step at a time. Based on the discussion on this mailing list those steps apparently have to be very small, but at least there is the possibility of movement :)

Cheers,
Sander

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20180314/0a9634ea/attachment.sig>