[anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] 2017-02 Review Phase (Regular abuse-c Validation)

On 22/01/2018 16:07, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via anti-abuse-wg wrote:
>> I agree that exaggeration is not useful, and probably we need to have
>> several clear attempts before turning down a contract, BUT, if we are
>> talking about proportionality, there are MANY cases of abuses where
>> the responsible LIRs aren't responding at all, and this means a very
>> big harm to the networks being abused. Is that proportional?
> 
> We're not discussing perpetration of abuse; we're discussing whether
> 2017-02 is fit for purpose.

This is indeed the case, whatever opinions of that may be.

Thanks,

Brian
Co-Chair, RIPE AA-WG