[anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] 2017-02 Review Phase (Regular abuse-c Validation)

On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:48:19 +0000
"Sascha Luck [ml]" <aawg at c4inet.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 03:42:09PM +0200, ox wrote:
> >I have not seen any objections to the process of emailing a alpha
> >numeric number to abuse-c and then having that number entered into a
> >website (after solving a capcha)
> >This would solve many problems as it would mean that the abuse-c
> >exists and is functional and not an auto-responder or other bot  
> 
> Did my email somehow not make it to the list? I believe I clearly
> objected to anything of this sort. And, moreover, the IA clearly
> states that the NCC has *no* mandate to prescribe to operators
> how they handle abuse email.
> 
> Additionally, the "community" has no mandate to prescribe to the
> NCC exactly how to implement a policy - this is a contractual
> matter.
> 
okay, but this is not that.

nobody is prescribing to anyone how to  handle abuse email.

*************************************
this is not an abuse complaint
*************************************

it is a verification that abuse-c is a functional email address.

do you see the difference?

so, still, there has been no objections to the verification process -
if you have an objection to the process or would like to contribute an
improvement, please do so Sascha?

Kind Regards

Andre