[anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] 2017-02 Review Phase (Regular abuse-c Validation)

Hi,

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 11:25:12AM +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> I have no problem with abuse-c validation, either via ARC, or the
> mechanism proposed in this policy, and probably not via a range of other
> mechanisms either.  But threatening to terminate the right of an
> organisation to continue to exist in the case of non compliance of the
> terms specified in 2017-02 is frankly absurd.

I second this concern.

I do see the need for a working abuse contact, and I do see the need of
sanctions in case a policy is violated, but "deregister all resources,
because your mail server was broken when we tested" is too extreme
(exaggeration for emphasis).

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20180122/89fb2ca8/attachment.sig>