[anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] 2017-02 Review Phase (Regular abuse-c Validation)

Thomas,

On 19/01/2018 15:44, Thomas Hungenberg wrote:
> On 19.01.2018 13:08, Marco Schmidt wrote:
>> The way that abuse reports are handled by the receiving party is 
>> usually defined by the internal procedures of the providers and not by RIPE 
>> Policies.
> 
> If the abuse-mailbox is valid but the resource holder constantly ignores
> abuse complaints sent to this mailbox for a longer time (no response,
> no action taken, phishing sites or botnet c2s etc. not taken down) -
> what is the process to escalate this (probably finally leading to the
> resource being withdrawn)?

There is no process being proposed for this in 2017-02. This proposal is
about validation of the abuse-mailbox attribute. If the community would
like there to be the possibility of further action in relation to this
specific situation, then a separate policy proposal would be required.

Thanks,

Brian
Co-Chair, RIPE AA-WG