[anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] 2017-02 Review Phase (Regular abuse-c Validation)

Despite what was said in the meeting, It looks like I'm not the only one then thinking that we should do the human verification ...

Regards,
Jordi

-----Mensaje original-----
De: anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net> en nombre de Marco Schmidt <mschmidt at ripe.net>
Fecha: viernes, 19 de enero de 2018, 13:09
Para: <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net>
Asunto: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] 2017-02 Review Phase (Regular abuse-c Validation)

    Dear Jordi,
    
    Thank you for your question.
    
    On 2018-01-18 19:44:51 CET, Jordi Palet Martinez wrote:
    > HOWEVER, I’ve a question regarding the impact analysis, and specially this sentence:
    > 
    > “To increase efficiency, this process will use an automated solution that will allow the validation of “abuse-mailbox:” attributes without sending an email. No action will be needed by resource holders that have configured their “abuse-mailbox:” attribute correctly.”
    > 
    > Reading the policy proposal, how the NCC concludes that it should be “without sending an email”?
    > 
    
    During the initial discussion phase and also during the Anti-Abuse WG 
    session at RIPE 75, several people stated that forcing providers to 
    reply to the RIPE NCC doesn't ensure that they will respond to 
    actual abuse reports. At the same time, such a policy requirement would 
    create additional workload to all providers. For these reasons, the proposers decided to remove such a requirement in v2.0 of their proposal.
    
    The RIPE NCC will focus on the technical accuracy of abuse contact 
    emails. These checks can be done without the need to send an email. 
    Validating that an abuse mailbox attribute is correctly configured
    ensures that abuse reports can reach their destination.
    
    The way that abuse reports are handled by the receiving party is 
    usually defined by the internal procedures of the providers and not by RIPE 
    Policies.
    
    I hope this clarifies.
    
    Kind regards,
    Marco Schmidt
    Policy Development Officer
    RIPE NCC
    
    Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum
    
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.