[anti-abuse-wg] oppose 2017-02 "Regular abuse-c Validation"

Hi,

do you operate so many different abuse mailboxes?

>From my perspective it makes perfect sense to ensure at least technical
availability, I've seen invalid addresses quite often and I would not
mind to respond to a few mails per year.


Am 07.09.17 um 14:07 schrieb Peter Hessler:
> STRONG OPPOSITION!
>
> As an operator who has to read abuse-c emails, this is a waste of my
> time.  I have real things to do, instead of bothering with this kind of
> crap.
>
> Responding to RIPE ping mails does not mean an abuse-c will respond to
> emails from non-RIPE entities, nor that a mailbox will keep working
> in-between pings.
>
> This is simply busy work, and has no value.
>
> Additionally, the threat that RIPE will deregister for failure to
> respond is insulting, vulgar, and obscene.
>
>
 

Regards,
Alexander Schaefer

--
Alexander Schaefer
Group Head of Abuse Management

Host Europe GmbH is a company of HEG

Email: alexander.schaefer at heg.com
Office: Hansestrasse 79, 51149 Cologne

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Host Europe GmbH - http://www.hosteurope.de
Welserstraße 14 - 51149 Köln - Germany
HRB 28495 Amtsgericht Köln - USt-IdNr.: DE187370678
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Claus Boyens, Tobias Mohr