This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] @EXT: RE: 2017-02 New Policy Proposal (Regular abuse-c Validation)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] @EXT: RE: 2017-02 New Policy Proposal (Regular abuse-c Validation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New on RIPE Labs: TLS Security and Data Centre Monitoring
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Malcolm Hutty
malcolm at linx.net
Wed Oct 11 20:55:10 CEST 2017
On 11/10/2017 19:16, Gert Doering wrote: >> Does this constitute a declaration of consensus in support of this >> proposal by the WG Chairs? > > After the discussion phase, the PDP does not require consensus. It only > requires the desire to go ahead by the proposer (and agreement by the > WG chairs). > > https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-642 Thanks for the clarification. -- Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523 Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/ London Internet Exchange Ltd Monument Place, 24 Monument Street London EC3R 8AJ Company Registered in England No. 3137929 Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] @EXT: RE: 2017-02 New Policy Proposal (Regular abuse-c Validation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New on RIPE Labs: TLS Security and Data Centre Monitoring
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]