[anti-abuse-wg] 2017-02 New Policy Proposal (Regular abuse-c Validation)

On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 11:29:38 +0000 (UTC)
denis walker <ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Just because that policy didn't force people to enter valid
> information with a threat of deregistration is no reason for anyone
> to enter junk into the database. There has always been a condition of
> membership that people enter and maintain correct information in the
> RIPE Database. A policy for verifying email addresses was left for
> another day...that day seems to be now... cheersdenis
> 

then you should be offering improvements to this proposal and support
it. as per your own words and implication:

this policy is needed.

it is not only a moral and ethical imperative to ensure the highest
standards and leadership role that RIPE has become known and respected
for, but as you said: the time has come.

so, all moral, good and ethical people should stand up and add,
improve, support. and not simply say: well i am neither for not
against...

clearly you are supportive of this as non support of this makes no
sense other than to derail ethical and moral behavior towards public
owned allocated resources.

Andre