[anti-abuse-wg] fake abuse lists

> look at the headers of this email, check my hetzner.de IP number and then do the same for other reporting systems...

OMG, you are using Hetzner.de as a sender! An ISP with a dirty history of repression of press freedom and defense of spammers and arrogant political psychopaths.

Using Hetzner's IP is a risk, for sure. Your IP is clean... NOW!
You're right. You are involved with criminal enterprise, but you are pointing in the wrong direction.

BTW, your WordPress is outdated (under 4.7.5). Website outdated means "high risk" and can be listed by mistake. ;)

About virtual or real honeynets, make contact and help them!

Marilson

From: ox 
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 1:57 AM
To: Marilson 
Cc: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net 
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] fake abuse lists

On Fri, 26 May 2017 01:14:24 -0300
"Marilson" <marilson.mapa at gmail.com> wrote:

> The SPFBL.net is not a criminal enterprise. It's just another
> competitor of you and it's welcome considering the criminal attitudes
> of companies like Spamcop and Netcraft.
> 

Weird that they would suddenly list me for abuse, whereas there has been no abuse...

And, after checking, they are listing many honeynets, reporting systems
and others, also...

look at the headers of this email, check my hetzner.de IP number and
then do the same for other reporting systems...

all listed.

coincidence?

No. - Criminal Enterprise or criminals in their enterprise or some
other low life scummy type behavior...



> http://www.nic.br/videos/ver/gter-42-spfbl-aplicacao-p2p-para-prevencao-de-spam/
> 
> The SPFBL.net aims to be a collaborative system to combat spam. A
> cooperative system: users share alerts against spammers through a
> reputation mechanism. I hope they succeed because the Brazilian
> population is tired of being the victim of damn ISPs. But take care,
> consider this with a grain of salt, after all they are... Brazilians.
> 
> Marilson
> 
> From: anti-abuse-wg-request at ripe.net 
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 7:00 AM
> To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net 
> Subject: anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 66, Issue 8
> 
> Send anti-abuse-wg mailing list submissions to
> anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://mailman.ripe.net/
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> anti-abuse-wg-request at ripe.net
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> anti-abuse-wg-owner at ripe.net
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of anti-abuse-wg digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. fake abuse lists (ox)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 07:20:58 +0200
> From: ox <andre at ox.co.za>
> To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net
> Subject: [anti-abuse-wg] fake abuse lists
> Message-ID: <mailman.2.1495706402.1949.anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Can anyone share any experiences with:  http://spfbl.net/en/dnsbl/
> 
> It seems that they list servers that are used to file complaints with
> Spamcop and other blacklists - as "spam" servers...
> 
> They do not de-list these servers, ever, and it seems like a criminal
> enterprise or services designed to 'punish' or list complainants or
> victims?  
> 
> there are of course other 'fake' / non maintained and worthless 
> blacklists, like abuse-att.net etc etc. but these generally do not go
> out of their way to punish victims...
> 
> What is the best way to fight criminal enterprises that enter data
> streams and 'hide' / market etc as ethical service providers? 
> 
> Andre
> 
> 
> 
> End of anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 66, Issue 8
> ********************************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20170526/905e5e44/attachment.html>