This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse: Too big to fail
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse: Too big to fail
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse: Too big to fail
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ox
andre at ox.co.za
Mon Jun 19 07:41:24 CEST 2017
On Mon, 19 Jun 2017 10:58:17 +0530 Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com> wrote: >>> And what blocklist out there except the obscure and kooky is >>> actually listing twitter? >> >> Easy answer: All ethical, honest and functional blocklists lists >> Twitter as the spammer it is. >> >> The correct question, the one you should be asking, is - Why are not >> all blocklists listing Twitter. >> >> Of course, you would not be asking that question :) > > True. I have other and better questions to ask. > So, ask? The truth is that many blocklists are not ethical, honest or even functional as they white list Spammers like Twitter simply because their users want emails from this multinational Spammer and not because they function as a 'list of spammers' So, many RBL / DNSBL are broken as they do not list or treat all spammers equally, but make 'exceptions' for 'special' spammers... Anyway, as we are all powerless and many of us (like you) think it is " obscure and kooky" to actually list spammers... what is your better questions? Andre
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse: Too big to fail
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse: Too big to fail
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]