This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Language on List
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Language on List
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Language on List
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ox
andre at ox.co.za
Tue Jan 31 10:34:08 CET 2017
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:21:37 +0000 Brian Nisbet <brian.nisbet at heanet.ie> wrote: > I shall be more clear, in that case. I have little or no problem with > generalised swearing. It's a part of modern language and while I > generally would not use it in professional written communications > myself, I'm not going to attempt to censor anyone else for it. > > What I do not believe is acceptable is ad hominem attacks. There were > what I believe were implied anti-Semetic comments made during the > recent thread and that is not something that is allowed. Simple as > that. > +1 and thank you so much for being direct, it needed to be said so that there is no confusion about the problem that exists. Andre
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Language on List
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Language on List
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]