[anti-abuse-wg] Fwd: Re: RBL policy

On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 12:30:13 +0000
HRH Prince Sven Olaf von CyberBunker <svenk at xs4all.nl> wrote:
> now, please take your shitty nagging about 'abuse' of your crappy
> silly old smtp protocol, which doesn't even -originate- from our
> networks in the first fucking place, and stick it where the sun
> doesn't shine... as for malware... windows is the malware there... it
<snip snip>

You are obviously an intelligent person and I am sure you have a lot to
contribute to an emailing list discussing abuse involving smtp where
you have subscribed using smtp, etc etc.

What would really help (instead of simply /dev/null) would be some type
of structure to your rantings as some of it seems actually valuable and
important but it is mixed in with so much bullshit that it is too much
work and effort to separate the shit from the gold. 

Is your problem with RBL's in general? - Are you saying that all DNSBL
is evil? or just Spamhaus? You obviously have not nulled all 25 - as
 poc of your 194.109.24.25:25 is well functional :)

Also, maybe for clarity - Not all DNSBL uses pre emtive blocking, as we
established Simon Forster said that "All DNSBL are not the same" 

Sorry to be asking something which you may already have said in your
long rants somewhere, just that it will take too long to read all the crap
you wrote - easier to just ask :)

Andre