This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] DNS Abuse, Abuse of Privacy & Legitimizing Criminal Activity
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DNS Abuse, Abuse of Privacy & Legitimizing Criminal Activity
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DNS Abuse, Abuse of Privacy & Legitimizing Criminal Activity
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ox
andre at ox.co.za
Sun Jan 8 05:01:55 CET 2017
On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 15:30:02 +0000 Richard Clayton <richard at highwayman.com> wrote: > In message , ox <andre at ox.co.za> writes > >The people that are actively using RPZ to "protect" their users are > >finding that it is a piss poor method and that their users are as > >compromized as any other non RPZ user pool. > > that's a testable hypothesis -- what evidence do you have for it ? > Hindsight is always perfect. SpamCop is a DNS blocklist (which by the way IS and Ethical Anti Abuse Tool) it is reactive (after it has happened) abuse reporting system, with statistics. https://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=map Anyone can compare the abuse range volumes with that of a provider they know to be using PRZ I am not at liberty to discuss my own knowledge and personal experience in terms of specific companies. Andre
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DNS Abuse, Abuse of Privacy & Legitimizing Criminal Activity
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DNS Abuse, Abuse of Privacy & Legitimizing Criminal Activity
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]