This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] DNS Abuse, Abuse of Privacy & Legitimizing Criminal Activity
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DNS Abuse, Abuse of Privacy & Legitimizing Criminal Activity
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DNS Abuse, Abuse of Privacy & Legitimizing Criminal Activity
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Clayton
richard at highwayman.com
Fri Jan 6 13:18:30 CET 2017
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In message , ox <andre at ox.co.za> writes >The Bind software is the dominant DNS software on the planet. > >The IETF doc, relating to RPZ - is intended for Bind ops. Not really -- it's an attempt to document what Bind does in a way that will make it easier for other platforms to do the same thing (it turns out that there's a lot of interaction with the innards of Bind and setting out the semantics in a way that is platform independent is not as simple as you might initially think). >If left unchallenged, RPZ will become a standard (RFC) Not in the short term and not in the medium term either... there is a difference between a standard and an RFC -- as Jon Postel set out two decades ago https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1796 >Which will legitimize it. As it happens, I agree with that view (since I think that many people completely erroneously conflate RFCs with standards). >What I am objecting to, is that non ethical software and systems are >being legitimized. As it happens, I agree that there are serious ethical issues with RPZ And I said so in an academic paper about ethics (as applied to research into online criminality) several years back http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rnc1/ntdethics.pdf I've recently re-expressed my opinion on the relevant IETF list, that the document should not be adopted by the Working Group. Essentially I believe documenting RPZ in a platform independent way will lead to some Governments taking the view that they can censor the web by compelling the consumption of an Officially Endorsed RPZ feed -- at present, the fact that many platforms do not implement RPZ at all (or in what is probably an inconsistent manner) gives them some pause. I think we remove that (admittedly small for some regimes around the world) roadbump at our peril. - -- richard Richard Clayton Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin 11 Nov 1755 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 iQA/AwUBWG+LFju8z1Kouez7EQKaMwCeOntURBJAr/IKbWtos9rb5yQzsOMAnRNO QmGUXnqCk56ANjr9wLoXHvxn =A6Jd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DNS Abuse, Abuse of Privacy & Legitimizing Criminal Activity
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DNS Abuse, Abuse of Privacy & Legitimizing Criminal Activity
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]