[anti-abuse-wg] WG Chair Mailing List Decision

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 06:55:40AM -0800, Suresh Ramasubramanian
wrote:
>Do name names. Who – according to you – is a sockpuppet
>here? Or a troll?

You know who you are. It's a matter of simple traffic analysis.
If a message decrying the NCC and its members as a hive of
villainy appears here, followed minutes later by an outburst of
enthusiastic agreement, it's not a very far leap of logic to
assume a claque or sockpuppetry. The (albeit circumstantial)
evidence is archived for posterity.

>To be plain – I think many people on this list, you
>included, have zero background in abuse mitigation,

And I thank fate for that.

>and engaging
>in any sort of discussion with such people is, just  possibly, a
>slightly less unproductive endless loop than engaging with
>Kamphuis would have been

"such people" as myself are the operators of the networks without
which "such people" as yourself wouldn't exist. 
We have a stake in these discussions, like it or not.

rgds,
Sascha Luck