[anti-abuse-wg] WG Chair Mailing List Decision

Hi Shane,

I used the KKK as a bad taste metaphor to match the previous KKKKKKK laugh.

Look, *learn to live with the contradictory* does not mean that you have to accept any action...

Note that this WG Chair Mailing List Decision is not discussing *actions* but ideas, comments and insults.

What I wrote could also be said as follows, plagiarizing Evelyn B. Hall about Voltaire:

I may not agree to any of the words you say, but I will defend to the death the right of you to say them.

Censorship can not exist. It existed in the most negative periods of human history. We can not go back. Who use freedom of expression improperly, will answer for their actions in the courts. The WG is not a court, the co-chair is not a judge and the members are not a jury.

I have stated that there are many ISPs who act as criminals and / or are accomplices to criminal customers. I can say that because I have proof.

It is quite suspect someone claims should be banned from the group who are calling the ISPs of criminals. He should ask for evidence of this crime. Simply banishing, blocking, curtailing, is a fascist and suspicious attitude. But I will defend to the death the right of him to say it.

Shane, I hope I have clarified my position better.

Greetings
Marilson


From: Shane Kerr 
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 10:41 AM
To: Marilson 
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] WG Chair Mailing List Decision
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20170217/7592615b/attachment.html>