This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Why SPAM exists in 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Why SPAM exists in 2017
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Why SPAM exists in 2017
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
peter h
peter at hk.ipsec.se
Mon Feb 13 15:40:48 CET 2017
On Monday 13 February 2017 15.09, HRH Prince Sven Olaf von CyberBunker wrote:
>
> On 13 فبر, 2017 ص 09:42, Marilson wrote:
> > Finally someone telling the truth.
> > Yesterday Peter H answering to Olaf:
> > >> SPAM... is NOT... abuse. spam is fully legal. neither technical
> > abuse nor a crime or anything else
> > > WRONG. SPAM is illegal in sweden and EU.
> spam is fully legal in all of the eu as far as 1: the addressee is a
> business entity OR 2: the addressee opted in (including indirect opt-ins
> through partners etc).
The above is , of course wrong. spam is illegal, and delivered by illegal means,
usually by breking into someones computer and using a bystanders Internet resources.
As regards to opt-in, there is no thing as "indirect opt-ins"
The rest of the confusing message is left out to save electrons ;.)
>
zsnip>
>
--
Peter Håkanson
There's never money to do it right, but always money to do it
again ... and again ... and again ... and again.
( Det är billigare att göra rätt. Det är dyrt att laga fel. )
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Why SPAM exists in 2017
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Why SPAM exists in 2017
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]