This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] DMARC Solution Applied to this Mailing List
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DMARC Solution Applied to this Mailing List
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DMARC Solution Applied to this Mailing List
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Dec 18 16:46:37 CET 2017
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 02:16:43PM +0200, ox wrote:
> Please enlighten me why RIPE does not support publish any SPF records?
>
> I do see the RRSIG, so am keen on understanding why RIPE supports DMARC
> and no SPF?
Adam did not state RIPE NCC would "support DMARC". DMARC is full of shit.
What the RIPE NCC does is "activate workarounds to avoid mailing list
issues caused by other people running their domain with p=reject".
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20171218/4cf9fc38/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DMARC Solution Applied to this Mailing List
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DMARC Solution Applied to this Mailing List
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]