This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Police
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Police
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Police
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ox
andre at ox.co.za
Thu Aug 24 14:04:06 CEST 2017
Hmm, if it is spam malware, in .ru for example (and many other countries), it may actually be be legal software. so, no.. too general maybe you mean slavery, cannibalism & child abuse? (then, the Internet may be used to assist in the crimes similar to a car used to assist in a robbery...) Which specific Internet abuse qualifies for "internationally agreed prohibited items" ? and the real question still remains: "how tech should respond to abhorrent content, and whether content should be policed by registrars, browsers, or social networks" I say no. Whichever region law enforcement should enforce laws. Not huge multinational companies enforcing their monoculture on the world. Andre On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 14:58:47 +0530 Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > With a few exceptions you are correct - Child abuse material, malware > and such, where there is broad international consensus > > > On 24-Aug-2017, at 2:09 PM, Vittorio Bertola > > <vittorio.bertola at open-xchange.com> wrote: > > > > There can be no such thing as "internationally agreed prohibited > > items", as these are highly cultural. Even just inside the EU, for > > example, there >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Police
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Police
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]