This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] AS41609, AS203974, and Alexandru ("Andrei") Stanciu / Suceava, Romania
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] AS41609, AS203974, and Alexandru ("Andrei") Stanciu / Suceava, Romania
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] AS41609, AS203974, and Alexandru ("Andrei") Stanciu / Suceava, Romania
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Fri Aug 4 21:46:06 CEST 2017
ox <andre at ox.co.za> you wrote: >For Abuse purposes... Email Administrators should as a rule not >relay/accept emails from IP numbers with no reverse... I do agree completely. However as is made clear by this exact case, there are enough inbound mail servers still left on this planet that do not follow that rule so as to make it worthwhile for spammers to continue to go to great lengths... even hijacking old & abandoned legacy IPv4 blocks... to get "fresh" IP addresses, even if they can't set up any reverse DNS for those. In a way, this case shows just how desperate spammers have become in their search for "fresh" IP addres space. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] AS41609, AS203974, and Alexandru ("Andrei") Stanciu / Suceava, Romania
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] AS41609, AS203974, and Alexandru ("Andrei") Stanciu / Suceava, Romania
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]