This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] ASN effect on abuse
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Call For Agenda Items - AA-WG RIPE 75
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] AS41609, AS203974, and Alexandru ("Andrei") Stanciu / Suceava, Romania
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
alireza vaziri
alireza.vaziri at gmail.com
Thu Aug 3 17:38:38 CEST 2017
Dear colleagues, I have seen that some operators in EU have different ASN for their services, one for transit, another for their subscribers and one for their datacenter services. As long as some of the spam protection services treat ASNs differently, is there any relation between having different ASN and protecting their infrastructure's ASN to show up in lists like this: https://www.spamhaus.org/statistics/botnet-asn/ As a network/security administrator, do you drop/inspect/throttle connection based on ASN? Regards, Alireza Vaziri -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20170803/c6304802/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Call For Agenda Items - AA-WG RIPE 75
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] AS41609, AS203974, and Alexandru ("Andrei") Stanciu / Suceava, Romania
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]