This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Bringing Law Enforcement Into the RIPE Community
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Bringing Law Enforcement Into the RIPE Community
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Bringing Law Enforcement Into the RIPE Community
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Vittorio Bertola
vittorio.bertola at open-xchange.com
Wed Aug 2 12:03:12 CEST 2017
> Il 1 agosto 2017 alle 23.47 denis <ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk> ha scritto: > > > > > "Part of my job is to help LEAs understand this process and how their suggestions on changing policy would impact the broader RIPE community, such as making changes to the RIPE Database, for example, that would make it easier for them to find the closest service provider to an end user engaged in criminal > > activity. This isn't special treatment, though �the RIPE NCC also helps governments, network operators, banks, business owners or anyone else interested in submitting a policy proposal do these things as well. It's part of our job as > > the RIPE secretariat." > > > > I was under the impression that this is the function of the NCC > > Impact Statement within the PDP. Neither does ripe-642 mention > > any discussions with or "help" from the NCC prior to the working > > group process. Perhaps someone can amplify on this? > > > > > It has always been part of the RIPE NCC's work to help with understanding and following process. That is why they write documentation, run training courses and have Customer Support. Whether it is written or not, it has been said many times that the PDO will assist anyone who wishes to write a policy proposal. > Just as a suggestion, though, I will point out that stating "we don't treat governmental LEAs better, because we also help governments, us, people with money, people with money or anyone else" is not a great way to present this working plan. The list of targets for help should also include NGOs, academics, developers, free software projects, civil society groups and individual Internet users at large, i.e. constituencies that have a much harder time than governments and businesses to get heard into any bottom-up Internet policy-making process. Regards, -- Vittorio Bertola | Research & Innovation Engineer vittorio.bertola at open-xchange.com mailto:vittorio.bertola at open-xchange.com Open-Xchange Srl - Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20170802/2c8ad893/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Bringing Law Enforcement Into the RIPE Community
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Bringing Law Enforcement Into the RIPE Community
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]