This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Need policy to require abuse contacts to accept abuse reports
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Need policy to require abuse contacts to accept abuse reports
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Need policy to require abuse contacts to accept abuse reports
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Norman Diamond
n0diamond at yahoo.co.jp
Thu Sep 22 23:41:04 CEST 2016
Brian Nisbet wrote: > I would argue the community does not favour spammers (although I know > there are others who would say otherwise). However there are many other > considerations that must be considered, which only come out during > debate and discussion around such policies. Yes, if those other considerations that must be considered are opposed to the community which does not favour spammers, then those others might be correct to say otherwise. > Again, if you would like to proceed, I and the NCC would be very happy > to help. OK, if Mr. Nisbet and the NCC think it would be worth while to proceed, I will try to help. Do you need copies of bounces? Copies of the short e-mail discussion between me and the NCC? Yours sincerely, Norman Diamond
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Need policy to require abuse contacts to accept abuse reports
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Need policy to require abuse contacts to accept abuse reports
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]