[anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 59, Issue 7

On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 07:08:05 +0100
Richard Clayton <richard at highwayman.com> wrote:
> >"The non sanctioned use of a resource to infringe upon the usage
> >rights of another resource"
> >
> >(1) Resource
> >Any Internet Resource
> 
> that's a recursive definition -- which doesn't assist much 
> 
Okay, how can it be improved?

All Internet resources?

> >(4) Sanctioned
> >An action, event or situation originating from the authoritative
> >holder of rights to a resource that gives permission, or permission
> >is granted by direct implication, which authorises that situation,
> >event or action.   
> 
> excellent, the negation has disappeared
> 
Yeah, but now it does not cater for orphan resources

Remember that; 

If a resource is used with permission to abuse another resource = abuse

So, the negation exists to allow the abuse to the resource (itself) by
it's 'upstream'

Which is why sanctioned - now works... (in the new order - after
infringement...)

(4) Infringe
An action, event or situation which limits, reduces, undermines or
encroaches upon the fair use of a resource

(5) Sanctioned
Infringement upon the use of a resource by the assignor or
administrative holder of rights to a resource

Andre