This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Internet Abuse * pre-final
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Internet Abuse * pre-final
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Internet Abuse * pre-final
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ox
andre at ox.co.za
Thu Sep 1 07:12:04 CEST 2016
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 19:20:21 -0300 "Marilson" <marilson.mapa at gmail.com> wrote: > Subject: Fw: Spamcop error > > Thank you for nothing, arrogants of shit... It is very clear what and who what you are Marilson. > ...to help me identify the source of spam ?!? I don’t need help of > anyone to identify the source of spam. Several times I corrected your > wrong source. I do this better than your company. What I can not do > is block a domain. Yes, I opted to send a copy of each of these > reports to my own address AND FOR THOSE NETWORKS REFERENCED IN SCAN. > > > You then flipped out on Cisco's Privacy Mailer because we were > > sending you mail, mail you sent yourself. > > Are you crazy? A half-wit? Is that your excuse for your criminal > behavior? I copied to Cisco’s Privacy Mailer because you never sent Clearly the problem here is that you, Marilson, completely overestimate your own technical skills and abilities. It is always very difficult to communicate with technically ignorant people, more so if they are also extremely belligerent. > From: SpamCop/Richard > Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 12:14 PM > To: Marilson > SpamCop operates very independently of Cisco. The privacy office is > in place to ensure we operate according to the privacy policy > published by Cisco and to investigate where there is an accusation or > suspicion the privacy policy may have been breached... > *************************************************************** > Well Andre, Richard is not a honorable, ethical and honest guy. Very clearly, he is honorable and ethical, it is plain for all to see. > You can use the argument you wish to explain these facts. But I will > not discuss it, in this group, with you. My goal was to denounce > spamcop here. Thank you. My disputes with SpamCop and Cisco will And all you posted was how ignorant you are. If I were you, I would approach a real Internet engineer and have him help you and explain to you how the Internet works. You obviously have a lot to learn but, you probably will not do that, what you will do is tell me how stupid I am or tell yourself that the problem is also with Andre, Andre is an idiot. etc etc. etc - Instead of actually reading what I am typing and improving yourself. (and stop calling entire communities: "arrogants of shit" or calling SpamCop deputies criminals) Andre
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Internet Abuse * pre-final
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Internet Abuse * pre-final
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]