[anti-abuse-wg] 2016-01 Discussion Period Extended Until 21 June 2016 (Include Legacy Internet Resource Holders in the Abuse-c Policy)

Hi,

While I do agree with the rationale in "It will benefit the entire
Internet community to have better quality abuse contact data", I don't
believe that the policy text provides any help towards that goal, quite
the contrary.

Specifically: forcing people to add an abuse-c as a matter of ticking a
checkbox leads to not-working or ignored abuse email boxes. And I rather
have no abuse-c than an ignored one - it is a clear signal and leads to
much better use of a reporters time.

Make sure that people need to make an informed choice by not providing
an abuse-c, but dot not force.

So I keep opposing the policy.

best,
Gilles Massen