This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 55, Issue 4
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] What if provider not answering abuse reports?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Help requied Mambas Computer services ex drc001
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marilson
marilson.mapa at gmail.com
Mon May 9 16:16:42 CEST 2016
Shane, I know that. The title of this ripe-409 document (jun2007) is Good Practice In Minimising Email Abuse. I quoted you with question marks in the expectation that Karim told us which kind of abuse. Sorry my bad English. Up until Marilson -----Mensagem Original----- From: anti-abuse-wg-request at ripe.net Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 7:00 AM To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net Subject: anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 55, Issue 4 Send anti-abuse-wg mailing list submissions to anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://mailman.ripe.net/ or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to anti-abuse-wg-request at ripe.net You can reach the person managing the list at anti-abuse-wg-owner at ripe.net When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of anti-abuse-wg digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: What if provider not answering abuse reports? (Shane Kerr) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 11:39:51 +0200 From: Shane Kerr <shane at time-travellers.org> To: "Marilson" <marilson.mapa at gmail.com> Cc: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] What if provider not answering abuse reports? Message-ID: <20160509113951.24347e4a at pallas.home.time-travellers.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Marilson, At 2016-05-07 09:33:01 -0300 "Marilson" <marilson.mapa at gmail.com> wrote: > > But as Shane wrote: > True although apparently in this case it is not an e-mail issue. :) > ?? The RIPE document is recommendations for spam. The abuse reported is apparently not spam (although I don't think that we don't know the exact details). Therefore the RIPE document is probably not helpful. Perhaps it would be worthwhile making a general best practice document with recommendations for handling abuse, but I don't think that such a RIPE document exists now. Cheers, -- Shane -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20160509/e75edf04/attachment-0001.sig> End of anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 55, Issue 4 ********************************************
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] What if provider not answering abuse reports?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Help requied Mambas Computer services ex drc001
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]