This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] What if provider not answering abuse reports?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] What if provider not answering abuse reports?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] What if provider not answering abuse reports?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Shane Kerr
shane at time-travellers.org
Mon May 9 11:39:51 CEST 2016
Marilson, At 2016-05-07 09:33:01 -0300 "Marilson" <marilson.mapa at gmail.com> wrote: > > But as Shane wrote: > True although apparently in this case it is not an e-mail issue. :) > ?? The RIPE document is recommendations for spam. The abuse reported is apparently not spam (although I don't think that we don't know the exact details). Therefore the RIPE document is probably not helpful. Perhaps it would be worthwhile making a general best practice document with recommendations for handling abuse, but I don't think that such a RIPE document exists now. Cheers, -- Shane -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20160509/e75edf04/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] What if provider not answering abuse reports?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] What if provider not answering abuse reports?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]