[anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

Hi,

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 06:50:52PM +0100, denis wrote:
> Maybe we should talk about making admin-c and tech-c work like abuse-c. 
> That would be a step in the right direction.

So you want to add millions of unmaintained organization: objects to the
millions of unmaintained admin-c:/tech-c: references?

Sounds like a very good plan to improve data quality!

What?!

(I wouldn't mind the hierarchical lookup capability that abuse-c: has,
so "if an inetnum has no tech-c:, find the next less specific and use that",
but the indirection via org and mandatory role is way too silly to be 
extended further.  Maybe you should start *using* the database for a while,
like, "work at an ISP", so you can see which ideas are just not practical
from a user point of view?)

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20160310/7cb060e5/attachment.sig>