This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] Fw: objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gilles Massen
gilles.massen at restena.lu
Tue Mar 8 09:40:51 CET 2016
On 07/03/16 13:33, Gert Doering wrote:
> I would like abuse-c: much more if it were changed in two ways:
>
> - permit abuse-c: in inet(6)num: objects
> - permit abuse-c: to point to a normal person: object, not only role:
+many.
> my main issue is the forced indirection through organisation: objects
> which might not exist ("because there is no need to create a separate
> organisation: object just to earmark a specific inetnum: so abuse could
> go somewhere else").
+many, again. This is what is expected by anyone working with the RIPE DB.
[...]
> Maybe some extended outreach activity could be started to actually ensure
> that some human is alive at ERX holders that the NCC had no contact
> anymore since <x> years - but friendly, not pushy. They have been here
> first, we have no authority over them.
Entirely reasonable.
Gilles
--
Fondation RESTENA - DNS-LU
2, avenue de l'Université
LU-4365 Esch-sur-Alzette
tel: +352.4244091
fax: +352.422473
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] Fw: objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]