This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
Tue Mar 8 09:17:57 CET 2016
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 11:12 PM, Sascha Luck [ml] <aawg at c4inet.net> wrote: > I do not want to be subscribed to every godsdamn mailing list > @ripe.net, but I *have* to because otherwise some policy will be > imposed on me that I never even heard about and that supposedly > "has reached consensus". There is actually an easy fix for that. It stalled several times already, but I started poking behind the scenes once again: Proper PDP backend handling. That means diffs, that means plain text instead of Word, and that means one canonical repository which contains all information on ongoing and stalled work as well as all policies. Richard
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]