This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
denis
ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk
Mon Mar 7 20:38:36 CET 2016
Hi Suresh On 07/03/2016 13:19, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > >> On 07-Mar-2016, at 5:44 PM, Niall O'Reilly <niall.oreilly at ucd.ie> >> wrote: >> >> I think Peter Koch, Gert Doering, and Gilles Massen have answered >> this question adequately already. > > Gert followed a rather socratic method - answering a question with > another :) > > The current method is absolutely not useful in that the lack of > standardization means people (including me) who are stuck with large > amounts of phish to report have no other alternative but do a > substantial part of the process manually. As I said in previous replies, abuse-c is standardised and is fully deployed for RIPE NCC resources. You should not need to do any manual lookups. cheers denis > > —srs > > Quoting Gert - > >> The relevant question for the PDP is "does 2016-01 help achieve the >> goal of better combatting Internet abuse"? >> >> [..] >>> I don't know why we are making the policy side so complicated. >>> The principle is simple. If you manage IP addresses in the public >>> domain, from where abuse can be generated, responsible management >>> requires you to provide abuse contact details!!! >> >> Will making "providing a mail address in a specific field" >> mandatory for people the RIPE NCC doesn't currently have a contract >> with (and that do not particularily frequently show up on the "evil >> boys list") help achieve your goals? Why?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]