This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Mon Mar 7 18:00:43 CET 2016
On 07-Mar-2016, at 10:18 PM, Niall O'Reilly <niall.oreilly at ucd.ie> wrote: > > At least for for 2028 (12 years further on), we can hope that pervasive adoption of > IPv6 will have made Legacy IPv4 resources irrelevant. History repeating itself will probably mean more comment fields for a bunch of v6 IP space as well V6 being handed out like candy because there is so much of it reminds me of the days when classful address blocks were available for the asking. While that is another discussion altogether - it is simply yet another instance of history repeating itself on a regular basis - so just cited as another example
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]