This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
andre at ox.co.za
andre at ox.co.za
Mon Mar 7 15:22:30 CET 2016
On Mon, 07 Mar 2016 05:56:54 -0800 Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote: > > the whole point of book keeping is to have accurate data and records > > > > so, pick your poison. All POV leads to exactly the same thing: the > > ncc needs accurate abuse-c as much as any of the other data. > > and it needs an accurate record of my blood type. no, just a record of what you say it is ;) (if you have public resources that belong to the world, so we all can openly and freely see that you are really pumping blood and are not a fake person) seriously though, with all the comments it is clear that the policy is controversial, although it should not be. I have not seen one opinion clearly stating that abuse is not an issue and that they do not care about abuse. this is simply because it is an issue and it is problematic and it is controversial, a mess and causes some people a lot of stress
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]