This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Mar 7 13:42:38 CET 2016
Hi, On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 06:06:04PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > On 07-Mar-2016, at 6:03 PM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > > > > - permit abuse-c: in inet(6)num: objects > > - permit abuse-c: to point to a normal person: object, not only role: > > [???] > > I???m actually +1 with these. And in fact even with the current spec there isn???t anything that says a person object can???t be abuse-c - though an outfit of any significant size might prefer to add a role account just so that multiple people can receive and handle abuse complaints. Yeah, for our LIR abuse contact, this totally makes sense - there is a department handling this (SPCA-RIPE), so the *option* of having a role: here is good. OTOH for my personal PI /24, the only abuse-c: ever will be me personally, so not being able to reference my person: object but having to create a role: for myself is a bit silly. gert -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 811 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20160307/a7abe5b9/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]